Directory
Discover new people, create new connections and make new friends
-
-
Judge Lifts Trump Block After Supreme Court Ruling
https://ettalkshow.com/judge-lifts-trump-block-after-supreme-court-ruling/Judge Lifts Trump Block After Supreme Court Ruling https://ettalkshow.com/judge-lifts-trump-block-after-supreme-court-ruling/0 Comments 0 Shares 3K Views -
Prophecy, Christ return #3. mark 13.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHxVz6Ndkac&t=4sProphecy, Christ return #3. mark 13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHxVz6Ndkac&t=4s
0 Comments 0 Shares 4K Views -
Prophecy, Christ return. #3. Mark 13.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHxVz6Ndkac&t=4sProphecy, Christ return. #3. Mark 13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHxVz6Ndkac&t=4s
0 Comments 0 Shares 4K Views -
### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ ·
President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs.
Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch.
An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences.
President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ · President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs. Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch. An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences. President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..
0 Comments 0 Shares 6K Views1
-
Americans Are Destroying Flock Cameras in Protest
https://thenewamerican.com/us/tech/the-flock-revolt-is-here/
Americans are destroying Flock cameras in illegal acts of protest. As a headline from tech publication Gizmodo eloquently phrased it, “Flock cameras have a people-love-smashing-them problem.”
Resistance to the Flock surveillance camera system has been building up since last year. In Suffolk, Virginia, 13 cameras were destroyed from April to October of 2025. One man was arrested after being caught on cameras that he didn’t smash. In October of 2025, someone took down six cameras in Eugene and Springfield, Oregon. One of the cameras had an expletive-laden note addressed to “ya surveilling f-cks.” In La Mesa, California, someone broke two cameras; one was smashed and left on the median. “This happened weeks after the city’s Flock contract moved ahead despite local opposition,” noted the folks at State of Surveillance. There were other incidents in Greenview, Illinois, and Lisbon, Connecticut, among others.Americans Are Destroying Flock Cameras in Protest https://thenewamerican.com/us/tech/the-flock-revolt-is-here/ Americans are destroying Flock cameras in illegal acts of protest. As a headline from tech publication Gizmodo eloquently phrased it, “Flock cameras have a people-love-smashing-them problem.” Resistance to the Flock surveillance camera system has been building up since last year. In Suffolk, Virginia, 13 cameras were destroyed from April to October of 2025. One man was arrested after being caught on cameras that he didn’t smash. In October of 2025, someone took down six cameras in Eugene and Springfield, Oregon. One of the cameras had an expletive-laden note addressed to “ya surveilling f-cks.” In La Mesa, California, someone broke two cameras; one was smashed and left on the median. “This happened weeks after the city’s Flock contract moved ahead despite local opposition,” noted the folks at State of Surveillance. There were other incidents in Greenview, Illinois, and Lisbon, Connecticut, among others.0 Comments 0 Shares 6K Views
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek