• America’s Founders Show Us How to Defeat Socialism


    Sacred Honor: The Declaration That Defines a Nation
    https://youtu.be/O1d3gn_H8ow?si=Fgr20DBbtw7cl9qM
    Daily Signal’s new documentary, “Sacred Honor: The Declaration That Defines a Nation,” is an in-depth investigation into America’s Declaration of Independence. Join Bradley Devlin, Victor Davis Hanson, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Missouri, Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, Dr. Kevin Roberts, and many more, as they tell the story of one of the greatest political dramas in world history. Special Thanks to: The Heritage Foundation | Washington, D.C. Hillsdale College’s Steve and Amy Van Andel Graduate School of Government | Washington, D.C. The Museum of the American Revolution | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania U.S. National Park Service | National Historic Park Pennsylvania Historical Images Courtesy of: Library of Congress Getty Images National Archives Smithsonian Institution National Portrait Gallery
    America’s Founders Show Us How to Defeat Socialism Sacred Honor: The Declaration That Defines a Nation https://youtu.be/O1d3gn_H8ow?si=Fgr20DBbtw7cl9qM Daily Signal’s new documentary, “Sacred Honor: The Declaration That Defines a Nation,” is an in-depth investigation into America’s Declaration of Independence. Join Bradley Devlin, Victor Davis Hanson, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Missouri, Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, Dr. Kevin Roberts, and many more, as they tell the story of one of the greatest political dramas in world history. Special Thanks to: The Heritage Foundation | Washington, D.C. Hillsdale College’s Steve and Amy Van Andel Graduate School of Government | Washington, D.C. The Museum of the American Revolution | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania U.S. National Park Service | National Historic Park Pennsylvania Historical Images Courtesy of: Library of Congress Getty Images National Archives Smithsonian Institution National Portrait Gallery
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views




  • Will This Simple Rule Stop Democrat Mail-In Ballot Fraud?
    =========================================================


    https://conservativehq.com/post/will-this-simple-rule-stop-democrat-mail-in-ballot-fraud


    According to recent testimony by Postmaster General David Steiner, the U.S. Postal Service could stop processing mail-in ballots for states that refuse to comply with President Donald Trump’s election integrity order requiring states to provide voter information to the federal government.


    According to President Trump’s election integrity proposal, states would need to provide to the Postal Service the names, addresses and ballot barcode numbers for individuals to receive a mail-in ballot.


    This would ensure that only citizens receive ballots and that ballots are not illegally duplicated.


    We urge CHQ readers to go to https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/02/2026-10968/ballot-mail-for-federal-elections to post a comment in favor of the proposed rule.


    Appearing before the Senate, Steiner defended the administration’s proposed policy after being questioned by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) about whether absentee ballots would continue to be delivered to states that decline to turn over their absentee voter lists.


    “If a state refuses to turn their absentee voter list over to the federal government, will the Postal Service still mail their ballots under this proposed rule?” Peters asked.


    “Under our proposed regulation, no,” Steiner responded. “We would tell the state that we need the manifest.”


    The proposal stems from President Trump’s executive order titled “Ensuring Citizen Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections,” which directs federal agencies to coordinate efforts to verify that only eligible U.S. citizens receive mail-in ballots, reported our friends at Big League Politics.
    Will This Simple Rule Stop Democrat Mail-In Ballot Fraud? ========================================================= https://conservativehq.com/post/will-this-simple-rule-stop-democrat-mail-in-ballot-fraud According to recent testimony by Postmaster General David Steiner, the U.S. Postal Service could stop processing mail-in ballots for states that refuse to comply with President Donald Trump’s election integrity order requiring states to provide voter information to the federal government. According to President Trump’s election integrity proposal, states would need to provide to the Postal Service the names, addresses and ballot barcode numbers for individuals to receive a mail-in ballot. This would ensure that only citizens receive ballots and that ballots are not illegally duplicated. We urge CHQ readers to go to https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/02/2026-10968/ballot-mail-for-federal-elections to post a comment in favor of the proposed rule. Appearing before the Senate, Steiner defended the administration’s proposed policy after being questioned by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) about whether absentee ballots would continue to be delivered to states that decline to turn over their absentee voter lists. “If a state refuses to turn their absentee voter list over to the federal government, will the Postal Service still mail their ballots under this proposed rule?” Peters asked. “Under our proposed regulation, no,” Steiner responded. “We would tell the state that we need the manifest.” The proposal stems from President Trump’s executive order titled “Ensuring Citizen Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections,” which directs federal agencies to coordinate efforts to verify that only eligible U.S. citizens receive mail-in ballots, reported our friends at Big League Politics.
    CONSERVATIVEHQ.COM
    Will This Simple Rule Stop Democrat Mail-In Ballot Fraud?
    According to President Trump’s election integrity proposal, states would need to provide to the Postal Service the names,...
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • Supreme Court Reins In Activist Lawsuits, Major Win for U.S. Businesses
    https://conservativebrief.com/supreme-court-activist-102293/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=258
    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday delivered a landmark victory for American companies and constitutional limits on judicial power.


    The nation’s highest court ruled 6-3 in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe (24-856) that neither the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) nor the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) allows private plaintiffs to sue for aiding and abetting alleged violations of international law.


    The ruling bolsters the Trump administration’s America First agenda by restoring proper roles: Congress and the executive handle foreign policy and create remedies when needed, while courts stick to enforcing enacted law.


    It protects U.S. technological leadership, deters forum-shopping by overseas claimants, and reaffirms that the Constitution does not empower judges to conduct foreign relations through private lawsuits.


    In an age of global competition and aggressive adversaries like Communist China, this is a commonsense defense of American sovereignty and enterprise.


    The decision slams the door on expansive, judge-made lawsuits that have long threatened U.S. businesses operating abroad.


    Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh.






    “Today, we close the door that Sosa cracked and hold that courts may not create new causes of action for violations of international norms,” Barrett wrote.


    “We also hold that the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, which contains an express cause of action, does not provide for aiding-and-abetting liability,” Barrett added.


    The case involved claims by unnamed Falun Gong practitioners alleging Cisco Systems and its executives aided Chinese government persecution by selling networking equipment used in surveillance.
    Supreme Court Reins In Activist Lawsuits, Major Win for U.S. Businesses https://conservativebrief.com/supreme-court-activist-102293/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=258 The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday delivered a landmark victory for American companies and constitutional limits on judicial power. The nation’s highest court ruled 6-3 in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe (24-856) that neither the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) nor the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) allows private plaintiffs to sue for aiding and abetting alleged violations of international law. The ruling bolsters the Trump administration’s America First agenda by restoring proper roles: Congress and the executive handle foreign policy and create remedies when needed, while courts stick to enforcing enacted law. It protects U.S. technological leadership, deters forum-shopping by overseas claimants, and reaffirms that the Constitution does not empower judges to conduct foreign relations through private lawsuits. In an age of global competition and aggressive adversaries like Communist China, this is a commonsense defense of American sovereignty and enterprise. The decision slams the door on expansive, judge-made lawsuits that have long threatened U.S. businesses operating abroad. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. “Today, we close the door that Sosa cracked and hold that courts may not create new causes of action for violations of international norms,” Barrett wrote. “We also hold that the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, which contains an express cause of action, does not provide for aiding-and-abetting liability,” Barrett added. The case involved claims by unnamed Falun Gong practitioners alleging Cisco Systems and its executives aided Chinese government persecution by selling networking equipment used in surveillance.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views