• Government Employees Fight Trump’s Reforms From Within the Executive Branch
    https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/09/07/federal-unions-act-like-deep-state-suing-block-trump-policy/?_bhlid=2e61f5ce7835887213133e75dd831a9f56cb9a87


    Who ultimately decides how the executive branch works? Is it the president, elected by the American people, or career federal employees and the unions that represent them?


    The American Federation of Government Employees, the largest union representing federal employees, sued the White House’s Office of Personnel Management last month, aiming to block new rules governing how federal employees are evaluated, disciplined, and removed.


    The lawsuit represents only the latest in a long series of legal challenges the union has brought against President Donald Trump’s administration since January 2025. According to a July roundup AFGE posted on its website, the union had filed 18 lawsuits against the administration before the latest case.
    Government Employees Fight Trump’s Reforms From Within the Executive Branch https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/09/07/federal-unions-act-like-deep-state-suing-block-trump-policy/?_bhlid=2e61f5ce7835887213133e75dd831a9f56cb9a87 Who ultimately decides how the executive branch works? Is it the president, elected by the American people, or career federal employees and the unions that represent them? The American Federation of Government Employees, the largest union representing federal employees, sued the White House’s Office of Personnel Management last month, aiming to block new rules governing how federal employees are evaluated, disciplined, and removed. The lawsuit represents only the latest in a long series of legal challenges the union has brought against President Donald Trump’s administration since January 2025. According to a July roundup AFGE posted on its website, the union had filed 18 lawsuits against the administration before the latest case.
    WWW.DAILYSIGNAL.COM
    Federal Unions Act Like a Deep State Against Trump
    Federal employee unions are acting like a deep state, suing the Trump administration not just to help workers but to block national policy.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 392 Views
  • Hashem Al-Ghaili
    S͏e͏d͏o͏p͏t͏r͏s͏n͏o͏3͏0͏6͏a͏0͏a͏9͏5͏l͏0͏7͏6͏7͏3͏8͏t͏h͏m͏c͏l͏8͏1͏7͏f͏1͏8͏a͏7͏m͏3͏0͏l͏8͏1͏7͏2͏c͏i͏a͏u͏2͏g͏0͏4͏a͏3͏m͏f͏h͏g͏ ·
    Local governments in the U.S. are switching off Flock AI cameras amid serious privacy and mass surveillance concerns.


    The high-speed automated license plate readers developed by Flock Safety are designed to help police find stolen vehicles and locate suspects by logging plates, times, and locations.


    However, the surveillance network—which now maps over 122,000 active cameras nationwide—is facing a significant grassroots revolt. According to data from the anti-surveillance group DeFlock, 95 U.S. jurisdictions have rejected proposed installations, while dozens more have canceled contracts or deactivated operational cameras.


    Concerns range from the erosion of public trust to fears that private vehicle data could be accessed by federal agencies. Additionally, police officers in dozens of U.S. states have been accused of — and in some cases, even terminated for — using the cameras to stalk partners and exes.
    Hashem Al-Ghaili S͏e͏d͏o͏p͏t͏r͏s͏n͏o͏3͏0͏6͏a͏0͏a͏9͏5͏l͏0͏7͏6͏7͏3͏8͏t͏h͏m͏c͏l͏8͏1͏7͏f͏1͏8͏a͏7͏m͏3͏0͏l͏8͏1͏7͏2͏c͏i͏a͏u͏2͏g͏0͏4͏a͏3͏m͏f͏h͏g͏ · Local governments in the U.S. are switching off Flock AI cameras amid serious privacy and mass surveillance concerns. The high-speed automated license plate readers developed by Flock Safety are designed to help police find stolen vehicles and locate suspects by logging plates, times, and locations. However, the surveillance network—which now maps over 122,000 active cameras nationwide—is facing a significant grassroots revolt. According to data from the anti-surveillance group DeFlock, 95 U.S. jurisdictions have rejected proposed installations, while dozens more have canceled contracts or deactivated operational cameras. Concerns range from the erosion of public trust to fears that private vehicle data could be accessed by federal agencies. Additionally, police officers in dozens of U.S. states have been accused of — and in some cases, even terminated for — using the cameras to stalk partners and exes.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • How a U.S. Government #Mercury Trial Became a Benchmark for #Dental Amalgam – and Why Its Record Demands to Be Reopened - #Health - https://preventivedentalhealth.substack.com/p/how-a-us-government-mercury-trial
    How a U.S. Government #Mercury Trial Became a Benchmark for #Dental Amalgam – and Why Its Record Demands to Be Reopened - #Health - https://preventivedentalhealth.substack.com/p/how-a-us-government-mercury-trial
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • #NYC #NewYorkCity Mayor #ZohranMamdani Releases 400-Page Blueprint for Government-Enforced #Racial Favoritism https://gellerreport.com/2026/09/new-york-city-mayor-mamdani-releases-400-page-blueprint-for-government-enforced-racial-favoritism.html/
    #NYC #NewYorkCity Mayor #ZohranMamdani Releases 400-Page Blueprint for Government-Enforced #Racial Favoritism https://gellerreport.com/2026/09/new-york-city-mayor-mamdani-releases-400-page-blueprint-for-government-enforced-racial-favoritism.html/
    GELLERREPORT.COM
    New York City Mayor Mamdani Releases 400-Page Blueprint for Government-Enforced Racial Favoritism - Geller Report
    “New York’s history has been one of colonization, exploitation, and racial oppression,” the plan states.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 344 Views
  • #Nebraska Court to Decide if Government #Education is Unconstitutional https://libertysentinel.substack.com/p/nebraska-court-to-decide-if-government
    #Nebraska Court to Decide if Government #Education is Unconstitutional https://libertysentinel.substack.com/p/nebraska-court-to-decide-if-government
    LIBERTYSENTINEL.SUBSTACK.COM
    Nebraska Court to Decide if Government ‘Education’ is Unconstitutional
    The government wants your children—and your money: Nebraska parents take the school system to court to challenge its legality.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 776 Views
  • ARCHBISHOP VIGANÒ JUST DROPPED A NUCLEAR TRUTH BOMB
    https://youtu.be/l4iXbzxDBFA?si=EF_NHG7BxZyoyutV
    When a senior Catholic Archbishop — a former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States — openly accuses global elites of infiltrating Western governments to impose Agenda 2030… the world should stop and listen.
    ARCHBISHOP VIGANÒ JUST DROPPED A NUCLEAR TRUTH BOMB https://youtu.be/l4iXbzxDBFA?si=EF_NHG7BxZyoyutV When a senior Catholic Archbishop — a former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States — openly accuses global elites of infiltrating Western governments to impose Agenda 2030… the world should stop and listen.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3K Views
  • The Bunker State: The Government Will Survive, But Will The #Constitution? https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_bunker_state_the_government_will_survive_but_will_the_constitution
    The Bunker State: The Government Will Survive, But Will The #Constitution? https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_bunker_state_the_government_will_survive_but_will_the_constitution
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • Will Supreme Court Ruling Make It Harder for Noncitizens to Vote?
    https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/08/25/will-supreme-court-ruling-make-it-harder-for-noncitizens-to-vote/
    The Supreme Court’s Monday decision cleared the way for the Department of Homeland Security to establish a state-by-state list of eligible voters based on a crosscheck of citizenship data, the Social Security database, and other government information.


    “The DHS can determine who is eligible to vote because the federal government does not want to be complicit in fraud through sending mail-in ballots to noncitizens,” Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told the Daily Signal. “So it makes sense as to why the administration would want to prioritize this.”


    The list would be shared with states, but states are not obligated to use the list to police voter rolls.
    Will Supreme Court Ruling Make It Harder for Noncitizens to Vote? https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/08/25/will-supreme-court-ruling-make-it-harder-for-noncitizens-to-vote/ The Supreme Court’s Monday decision cleared the way for the Department of Homeland Security to establish a state-by-state list of eligible voters based on a crosscheck of citizenship data, the Social Security database, and other government information. “The DHS can determine who is eligible to vote because the federal government does not want to be complicit in fraud through sending mail-in ballots to noncitizens,” Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told the Daily Signal. “So it makes sense as to why the administration would want to prioritize this.” The list would be shared with states, but states are not obligated to use the list to police voter rolls.
    WWW.DAILYSIGNAL.COM
    Will Supreme Court Ruling Make It Harder for Noncitizens to Vote?
    The Supreme Court’s Monday decision cleared the way for the Department of Homeland Security to establish a state-by-state list of eligible voters based on a
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3K Views
  • How the Transgender Movement Lost the Power to End Debate
    https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/08/23/how-transgender-movement-lost-power-end-debate/?_bhlid=34b9c4725ec462487343518d5c1e79d96b585d8b


    Transgender activists once used maximalist legal arguments to force their worldview on American society, but now they’re arguing defensively.


    Activists are accusing the government of trying to silence them and take away their health care benefits. To some degree, this strategy represents a legal response to President Donald Trump’s reelection, but it also reveals an important cultural development.


    “The social and cultural permission gatekeepers on the Left have sort of lost the battle on whether or not you can speak out on these issues and have a different opinion than the Left and continue to function in civil society,” Hiram Sasser, executive general counsel for First Liberty Institute, tells the Daily Signal.
    How the Transgender Movement Lost the Power to End Debate https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/08/23/how-transgender-movement-lost-power-end-debate/?_bhlid=34b9c4725ec462487343518d5c1e79d96b585d8b Transgender activists once used maximalist legal arguments to force their worldview on American society, but now they’re arguing defensively. Activists are accusing the government of trying to silence them and take away their health care benefits. To some degree, this strategy represents a legal response to President Donald Trump’s reelection, but it also reveals an important cultural development. “The social and cultural permission gatekeepers on the Left have sort of lost the battle on whether or not you can speak out on these issues and have a different opinion than the Left and continue to function in civil society,” Hiram Sasser, executive general counsel for First Liberty Institute, tells the Daily Signal.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 4K Views
  • Supreme Court Backs Trump Election Integrity Order in Mail Ballot Fight
    https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/08/24/supreme-court-backs-trump-election-integrity-order-in-mail-ballot-fight/


    The Supreme Court on Monday sided with President Donald Trump in a mail-in ballot case stemming from his election integrity executive order.


    The case is not over, but the high court allowed the federal government to continue implementing the election integrity policies while the case is on appeal.


    The justices decided in a 6-3 shadow docket ruling to stay a district court ruling that blocked Trump’s executive order on election integrity and held that the states challenging the order lacked standing.


    Democrat officials in 23 states and the District of Columbia, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, sued to block Trump’s March executive order, which, among other things, created a list of eligible voters. The executive order required the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.
    Supreme Court Backs Trump Election Integrity Order in Mail Ballot Fight https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/08/24/supreme-court-backs-trump-election-integrity-order-in-mail-ballot-fight/ The Supreme Court on Monday sided with President Donald Trump in a mail-in ballot case stemming from his election integrity executive order. The case is not over, but the high court allowed the federal government to continue implementing the election integrity policies while the case is on appeal. The justices decided in a 6-3 shadow docket ruling to stay a district court ruling that blocked Trump’s executive order on election integrity and held that the states challenging the order lacked standing. Democrat officials in 23 states and the District of Columbia, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, sued to block Trump’s March executive order, which, among other things, created a list of eligible voters. The executive order required the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.
    WWW.DAILYSIGNAL.COM
    Supreme Court Backs Trump Election Integrity Order in Mail Ballot Fight - The Daily Signal
    The Supreme Court on Monday sided with President Donald Trump in a mail-in ballot case stemming from his election integrity executive order.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3K Views
  • ### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ ·
    President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs.
    Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch.
    An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences.
    President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..
    ### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ · President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs. Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch. An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences. President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 4K Views