Federal agents raid Ilhan Omar’s DC home amid immigration fraud investigation https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ilhan-omars-home-dc-searched-hsi-pre-dawn-raid Multiple federal agents with HSI jackets were seen outside Omar's Washington, D.C. home in the early hours of Monday. Two sources close to the investigation say the search stems from a criminal fraud investigation into the Somali-born congresswoman's immigration paperwork, which was filled out by her late father when she was a child.

The Activist Pipeline That Explains Why Biden’s DHS Only Investigated 496 Visa Overstays Despite Getting 3.1M Tips https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/10/10/personnel-is-policy-inside-the-left-wing-coalition-behind-bidens-visa-overstay-enforcement-priorities/?_bhlid=f7b6114025bec1a7d24d03c4fe16f2ee87eed843 The many ties between the Biden administration and immigration activist groups likely help explain why Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested only eight people out of more than 3.1 million visa overstay leads, according to a Department of Homeland Security inspector general report. The report attributes the low number of investigations, in just 496 visa-overstay cases, in part to a September 2021 enforcement-priorities memorandum from DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. Just three months before Mayorkas’ memo, a coalition known as We Are Home urged the agency to exercise broad prosecutorial discretion and choose not to pursue older immigration violations, including visa overstays. Some coalition leaders had moved into top roles in the Biden White House and administration by the time of Mayorkas’ memo.

Victor Davis Hanson: Why Is Mark Carney Preparing for an American Invasion? https://youtu.be/sThU-_h5DD0?si=OqIsn-v3FoAsdxJw Mark Carney is escalating tensions with the United States, raising the possibility of an American invasion while looking to China and the European Union as alternatives to Canada’s traditional relationship with its closest ally. Victor Davis Hanson argues that Canada remains deeply dependent on the United States for trade, defense, and economic stability, and that turning away from that relationship will not solve the country’s larger problems. He also looks at Canada’s immigration, energy, defense, and economic policies and how its leaders brought the country to this point.

JoelPatrick BREAKING: The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to restore the Trump administration’s revamped SAVE citizenship verification database, allowing states to check registered voters against federal records including Social Security numbers. The ruling lifts a lower-court block and lets officials identify and remove non-citizens from voter rolls ahead of the 2026 midterms. Justices Jackson, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissented. The modified SAVE system, originally used to verify immigration status for benefits, now gives state and local election officials a faster way to confirm citizenship

SCOTUS: States' Rights vs. Immigration Chaos! https://www.youtube.com/live/3BlAMmhuYko?si=NVYRr3i9L2kS6bbs Can a state actually help enforce federal immigration law—or does the Constitution force states to sit on their hands while illegal immigration overruns their communities? That's the question at the heart of a major cert petition now before the Supreme Court, and Senators Ted Cruz and Chuck Grassley just filed a blistering amicus brief taking direct aim at the Eighth Circuit's decision to strike down Iowa's immigration law. Today we break it all down, plain-English style. The brief argues the real culprit is the Supreme Court's own 2012 decision in Arizona v. United States—a ruling so poorly reasoned it turned "conflict preemption" into a one-way ratchet: states that try to help Washington enforce the law get shut down, while sanctuary states that openly obstruct federal enforcement get a pass. Cruz and Grassley say it's time for the Court to fix its own mess before more states lose the ability to defend their citizens from an immigration crisis the Founders never envisioned tolerating.

### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ · President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs. Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch. An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences. President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..