Trump Against Great Odds to Stop Voter Fraud in Midterms – Jerome Corsi https://rumble.com/v7ed2hg-trump-against-great-odds-to-stop-voter-fraud-in-midterms-jerome-corsi.html Dr. Jerome Corsi, who has a Harvard PhD in political science and has written more than 50 books, is still predicting that “President Trump is Not Going to Allow Dems to Steal Midterms.” It’s not going to be easy as a federal judge recently blocked Trump from restricting out-of-control mail-in voting. The public is not seeing the battle because the Lying Legacy Media (LLM) is not reporting or under reporting the huge fight over voter fraud the Dems desperately need to win. President Trump is asking for the Supreme Court to step in with an emergency ruling. Dr. Corsi says, “The mainstream media would like to say that Trump is interfering with the elections by trying to get a fair election. How’s that interfering with the election? Trump wants the rules to be followed. He does not want illegals voting. . .. He does not want mail-in ballots sent out by the bushel to random people who did not request mail-in ballots. They say Trump is going to steal the election by having only legitimate voters vote.” It is clear illegal aliens are voting, and they are voting in very big numbers. Another voter fraud story that broke just this wee

A federal judge just cleared the way for the Trump administration to end deportation protections for Ethiopian migrants. The Boston judge lifted a hold on the decades-old Temporary Protected Status program after DHS determined conditions in Ethiopia had improved enough to end the protections. The ruling means Ethiopian nationals covered by TPS could now lose their ability to legally live and work in the U.S. It’s also the latest win for the administration’s TPS rollback after the Supreme Court allowed similar moves involving Haiti and Syria

SCOTUS: States' Rights vs. Immigration Chaos! https://www.youtube.com/live/3BlAMmhuYko?si=NVYRr3i9L2kS6bbs Can a state actually help enforce federal immigration law—or does the Constitution force states to sit on their hands while illegal immigration overruns their communities? That's the question at the heart of a major cert petition now before the Supreme Court, and Senators Ted Cruz and Chuck Grassley just filed a blistering amicus brief taking direct aim at the Eighth Circuit's decision to strike down Iowa's immigration law. Today we break it all down, plain-English style. The brief argues the real culprit is the Supreme Court's own 2012 decision in Arizona v. United States—a ruling so poorly reasoned it turned "conflict preemption" into a one-way ratchet: states that try to help Washington enforce the law get shut down, while sanctuary states that openly obstruct federal enforcement get a pass. Cruz and Grassley say it's time for the Court to fix its own mess before more states lose the ability to defend their citizens from an immigration crisis the Founders never envisioned tolerating.

### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ · President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs. Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch. An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences. President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..