Following the removal of posts and the subsequent banning of users responsible for abortion pill posts, Meta provided more clarification on its policy regarding the discussion of the sale of abortion drugs on Facebook.  This explanation comes after Facebook deleted posts trying to discuss the allocation of abortion pills, as reported by Motherboard. The Big […]

EVERY DAMN DAY OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP IS WINNING AND HE IS WINNING FOR AMERICA!! BECAUSE #1 HE ALWAYS PUTS AMERICA FIRST!! 🎯👌👍😇🙏👮‍♀️🚔❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 https://nypost.com/2022/06/29/manhattan-judge-ends-contempt-order-against-trump/

Padraig Martin on Gab: 'Gab as a Messaging "Force Multiplier" For those of you who wonder if Gab is an effective social media platform, consider the multitude of state political actors who have suddenly embraced political positions from the Christain Right. Only a few short years ago, Trump was holding up an LGBT flag at a rally. Contrast that, for a moment, with the DeSantis education bill that restricts sexual education to children. Yes, it is a limited bill, but it is a start - certainly better than the previous status quo. Now we have Roe overturned. In response, the Texas AG proposed the possibility of revisiting a ban on gay marriage. Multiple conservative states have made some indication that they will make some kind of moves to shift further to the right - from abortion bans to Constitutional Carry. It is as if they had a sudden epiphany... or did they? I believe the real reason has something to do with Gab. First, it is important to understand that all politicians are driven by two factors: money and voter numbers. If you do not have money, you need to have a large enough bloc that can potentially vote an incumbent out of office. Until the ascendancy of Gab, conservative voices were constrained on traditional social media sites - such as Twitter and Facebook. The problem with those platforms is obvious. Facebook and Twitter marginalize and silence truly conservative posts. This caused a collective "silence" from the Right. Thus, as the Left steamrolled the Western world with Cultural Marxism, the muzzled Right screamed into a silencer. Aloof politicians never heard our complaints en masse. Meanwhile, as we have seen repeatedly, deep pocket donors and corporations told establishment right figures to focus on economic issues and ignore cultural ones. They complied. However, with Gab's growth, the complaints from the Right cannot be ignored. Gab acts like a megaphone. Establishment right candidates have staff members with accounts on Gab and those staff members follow influencers on this platform. They report back up the chain. It was easy to ignore Parler, which was a terrible platform. It will be easy to ignore Truth Social, which is not only limited, but admits to censorship. Uncensored Gab, however, amplifies the messaging of the Right. In essence, Gab is a Christian and Dissident Right concentrate compared to the watered-down version of conservatism that is found on other controlled platforms. It cannot be ignored. That is why the SPLC and the ADL fear Gab, but not Truth Social. If you want to destroy Christianity, you must silence Christians. Gab gives Christians both a stage and a loudspeaker. As such, for those of you who think social media posts have no effect, you are wrong. They HAD no effect, because we were "yelling" into a censored vacuum. Look at the political shift locally and among your peers. The zeitgeist is changing. Gab acts like a force multiplier for the Right, amplifying our message, and effecting change.'

Andrew Torba ✝️ on Gab: 'The Truth About Ghislaine Maxwell that the Media Refuses to Report @RealRedElephants https://tv.gab.com/channel/realredelephants/view/the-truth-about-ghislaine-maxwell-that-62bd23568d19b95864ae9b51'

Waterboy on Gab: 'This is an email Rick Warren sent out from last August 5th, 2021. Oh my🤦‍♂️. No wonder he has women pastors at his church.'

Disclose.tv on Gab: 'JUST IN - S&P 500 down 21% in H1, posts worst return since 1970. Nasdaq 100 finished the first half down -30%, most since 2002.'

Dr Simone Gold: 'We stand on his shoulders'