• https://davidicke.com/2025/09/25/hillary-clinton-warns-against-the-rise-of-christianity-says-white-christian-men-are-causing-such-damage-to-the-united-states/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/25/hillary-clinton-warns-against-the-rise-of-christianity-says-white-christian-men-are-causing-such-damage-to-the-united-states/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Hillary Clinton WARNS against the rise of Christianity, says white Christian men are causing “such damage” to the United States
    🚨 NEW: Hillary Clinton WARNS against the rise of Christianity, says white Christian men are causing such damage to the United States The idea you could turn the clock back and try to recreate a world that never was, dominated by - let's say it! White men of a certain… pic.twitter.com/4WuEegZdRR — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 24, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    Angry
    3
    3 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/28/erika-and-tylers-bizarre-music-video/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/28/erika-and-tylers-bizarre-music-video/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Erika and Tyler’s Bizarre Music Video
    🚨 ERIKA & TYLER’S BIZARRE MUSIC VIDEO Old footage shows Erika Kirk playing the “crazy” girl who falls in love with and marries a guy played by Tyler. Then she zip lines past the numbers 9:10. The exact date Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Too many “coincidences” keep coming… pic.twitter.com/TDCyd67nw7 — HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) September 28, 2025 THE 'TYLER' OF FREEMASONRY: The Outer Guard @Alchemical_Tech decoded the symbology of 'Tyler Robinson' in this week's Syncromystic podcast out now on our Youtube channel. #CharlieKirkshot pic.twitter.com/62SiylaPZM — Richard Willett (@WTAFRich) September 21, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/30/how-the-system-works-hip-hop-musician-describes-meeting-with-private-prison-elite-planning-to-financially-entice-rappers-to-make-music-encouraging-violence-and-crime-to-fill-their-prisons-based-2/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/30/how-the-system-works-hip-hop-musician-describes-meeting-with-private-prison-elite-planning-to-financially-entice-rappers-to-make-music-encouraging-violence-and-crime-to-fill-their-prisons-based-2/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    How the system works – Hip-Hop musician describes meeting with private prison ‘elite’ planning to financially entice rappers to make music encouraging violence and crime to fill their prisons based on government money per inmate
    The meeting was in 1991. Look at what has happened since. Worth using a search engine or YouTube search to see who has promoted private prisons and they are not all musicians either. https://youtu.be/1IhwBqd5gxc?si=2jaZEyg2zh7aUDGB [reveal-banner]
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/16/the-2025-vmas-a-highly-symbolic-celebration-of-industry-slaves/
    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/16/the-2025-vmas-a-highly-symbolic-celebration-of-industry-slaves/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    The 2025 VMAs: A Highly Symbolic Celebration of Industry Slaves
    The 2025 VMAs featured Doja Cat entirely eating her lipstick, Sabrina Carpenter emerging from the sewers, and Lady Gaga dancing with zombie girls. While these things appear unrelated, they all point towards the same narrative. Here’s a look at the highly symbolic 2025 VMAs. At the beginning of the 2025 VMAs, host LL Cool J said: “Music is the force that brings us all toghter. And we’re leaving everything else at the door. This is our night off.” One would assume that these words meant that this year’s edition would focus on music, not agenda-pushing and social indoctrination. Well, they tried. However, for some of the biggest stars, it is simply not possible. Their entire acts are built to deliver specific ideas, symbols, and messages. In fact, the only reason they have a career and are allowed to be in places such as the VMAs is because they are the chosen vehicles for these agendas. As we’ve seen throughout this site’s history, this is not merely about political messages. It is about something more profound: It is about the elite celebrating their control of the minds, bodies, and souls of their industry plants. And, by extension, of the masses in general. As explained in previous articles, award shows are often built to convey a narrative using a select few key characters. In the 2025 edition of the VMAs, the show was mainly driven by Sabrina Carpenter, Doja Cat, Ariana Grande, and Lady Gaga. Appropriately enough, they were all featured on this site numerous times due to their Monarch mind control-themed content. Read more: The 2025 VMAs: A Highly Symbolic Celebration of Industry Slaves [reveal-banner]
    Haha
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 3K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/16/the-nicene-creed-was-overseen-at-the-council-of-nicaea-in-325-ad-by-roman-emperor-constantine-the-great-who-worshipped-a-god-called-sol-invictus-the-unconquered-sun-also-invincible-sun/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/16/the-nicene-creed-was-overseen-at-the-council-of-nicaea-in-325-ad-by-roman-emperor-constantine-the-great-who-worshipped-a-god-called-sol-invictus-the-unconquered-sun-also-invincible-sun/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    The ‘Nicene Creed’ was overseen at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD by Roman Emperor Constantine the Great who worshipped a ‘god’ called Sol Invictus, the ‘Unconquered Sun’, also ‘Invincible Sun’. This ‘god’s’ feast and festival day was December 25th which was called the Dies Natalis Solis Invicti (Birthday of the Invincible Sun). Constantine instigated the ‘day of rest’ as SUNday
    I never would have imagined in my wildest dreams the Vice President of the United States would be reciting the Nicene Creed while hosting the number 1 podcast in the world from the White House. Chills. pic.twitter.com/VjfWFC7NHi — Isabel Brown (@theisabelb) September 15, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 3K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/09/were-about-to-enter-false-flag-season/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/09/were-about-to-enter-false-flag-season/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    We’re about to enter ‘false flag’ season
    The UK Government’s Data (Use and Access) Bill, which received royal assent in June, has come into law and will be implemented forthwith. You probably haven’t even heard of it, because that is what happens when the government and their lapdog mainstream media want something to pass without public scrutiny. They simply don’t talk about it until it’s already well on the way to becoming law, or in some cases, already has. Big Brother Watch in the UK were one of very few voices pointing out the obvious implications of such a bill coming into law. Nearly all the bills that the government gets over the line, are there with the sole intention of giving them more control, and giving you and I less control over our own lives, less freedoms, and less money in our pockets, Some bills are about laying the groundwork for something else. They are about taking away the checks and balances that would prevent the government, from doing something they already have planned for further down the line. For instance, the World Health Organisation changed the definition of a pandemic to remove the words with enormous numbers of deaths and illness, meaning the powers that be, could later push the Covid button without the need for the deaths and illness to create a ‘pandemic’. The definition of vaccine has also subtly changed to accommodate the introduction of mRNA technologies. The newly adopted Data (Use and Access) Bill works on the same principle. Big Brother Watch stated in October last year that: “Our data protection laws are amongst the few legal protections we have against these threats (AI and the like), yet this Bill waters them down by simultaneously eroding privacy protections and restricting peoples’ control over their own data.” In other words, the protections that would allow you to keep certain things about yourself, your medical data for example, private, would be eroded. Big brother watch went on: “Meanwhile, advancing with a digital ID framework with serious implications for privacy that lacks a legal right to opt-out poses a serious threat to individual autonomy and consent.” And there is the point of all of this. Read more: We’re about to enter ‘false flag’ season [ickonic-banner]
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/13/governor-of-utah-spencer-cox-for-the-last-33-hours-i-had-been-praying-that-this-person-who-murdered-charlie-kirk-was-from-another-country/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/13/governor-of-utah-spencer-cox-for-the-last-33-hours-i-had-been-praying-that-this-person-who-murdered-charlie-kirk-was-from-another-country/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox: ““For the last 33 hours, I had been praying that this person (who murdered Charlie Kirk) was from another country.”
    🚨BREAKING: Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox: “For the last 33 hours, I had been praying that this person (who murdered Charlie Kirk) was from another country. That he was not one of us because we are not like that. But it was one of us. pic.twitter.com/7WZxH36DhI — CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) September 12, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/charlotte-train-stabber-says-he-was-under-mind-control/



    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/charlotte-train-stabber-says-he-was-under-mind-control/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Charlotte Train Stabber Says He Was Under Mind Control
    'He believed someone gave him a man-made material that controlled when he ate, walked, talked, etc...' (Ken Silva, Headline USA) The man who stabbed 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska to death on a public train in Charlotte has reportedly told his family that a government planted a chip in his body, and that he was under mind control. “He was a high risk. He was not in his right mind. He was not safe for society. We know what he has been dealing with the last three years. And now an innocent woman is dead,” said alleged killer DeCarlos Brown Jr.’s sister, Tracey Brown—as reported first by the Daily Mail. Brown reportedly told the outlet that she was assaulted by her older brother three years ago in an attack that saw him bite her and break a door, and that he’s a paranoid schizophrenic who told her multiple times that the government had implanted a chip in him. NEW - The Black career criminal and murderer of Iryna Zarutska now claims the government implanted materials in his body that made him commit the heinous crime.pic.twitter.com/yp1m36psM3 — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) September 10, 2025 Brown made similar comments to police on Jan. 19, when he was arrested for misusing 911. “He believed someone gave him a ‘man-made’ material that controlled when he ate, walked, talked, etc. Brown wanted officers to investigate this ‘man-made’ material that was inside of his body,” an arrest warrant in that case says. “Officers advised Brown that the issue was a medical issue and that there was nothing further they could do.” Read More: Charlotte Train Stabber Says He Was Under Mind Control [reveal-banner]
    2 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/how-tyranny-becomes-entrenched-9-11-and-the-police-states-endless-power-grabs/



    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/how-tyranny-becomes-entrenched-9-11-and-the-police-states-endless-power-grabs/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs
    “The greatest tyrannies are always perpetuated in the name of the noblest causes.”—Thomas Paine They said it was for safety. They said it was for order. They said it was for the good of the nation. They always say it’s for something good… until it isn’t. Nearly a quarter-century after 9/11, we are still living with the consequences of fear-driven government power grabs. What began as “temporary” measures for our security have hardened into a permanent architecture of control. The bipartisan police-state architecture that began with 9/11 has been passed from president to president and party to party, each recycling the same justifications—safety, security, patriotism—to expand its powers at the expense of the citizenry. So they locked down the country “for our safety.” They expanded surveillance “for our security.” They rounded up anyone who challenged the narrative “for the common good.” They erased names, ideas, and histories “to prevent offense.” They forced schools to teach only what was politically correct “for the children.” They censored speech “for our protection.” They targeted dissenters “to preserve peace.” They militarized the streets and called it “law and order.” These very abuses—once denounced when carried out by the Left—are now cheered, defended, and excused when carried out by the Right. People who once spoke passionately about truth, freedom, and faith have now fallen silent in the face of injustice, or worse, convinced themselves that nothing is wrong. The very voices that should be warning against tyranny are instead excusing it or looking away. This is the danger of double standards in politics: every tyranny is rationalized in the moment by its chorus of defenders. But history teaches that what goes around comes around. If you justify it now, you’ll have no defense when the tables turn. And yet, time and again, the lies we tell ourselves make it possible. The cult of personality. The blind loyalty to party. The belief that “our side” can’t be the villain. It never ceases to amaze how far people will go to excuse the actions of their favorite tyrant, even when those actions are the very things they once swore to oppose. The pattern of justifying tyranny is as old as power itself. Every abuse comes wrapped in the same excuse: we had to do it. After 9/11, Americans were told the Patriot Act and mass surveillance were “necessary to prevent terrorism.” The result was a sprawling security state that tracks every phone call, every online search, every purchase. The justification was security. The cost was freedom. Under Obama, drone warfare and the prosecution of whistleblowers were defended as “keeping America safe.” The president even claimed the power to assassinate U.S. citizens abroad without trial. The result was an unaccountable government acting as judge, jury and executioner. The justification was safety. The cost was due process. During the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns and mandates were imposed in the name of “public health,” laying the groundwork for a Nanny State empowered to micromanage every aspect of our lives—where we go, what we buy, who we see. The result was government claiming control over every aspect of daily life. The justification was saving lives. The cost was the right to govern our bodies. Under Trump, the script is familiar. National Guard deployments in American cities are justified as “restoring order.” Sweeping surveillance is framed as “protecting communities.” Crackdowns on dissent are defended as “stopping criminals.” Mental health round-ups of the homeless are justified as “helping the vulnerable.” Militarized patrols on city streets are justified as “cleaning up the streets.” Turning ICE into a roving army of lawless thugs is justified as “protecting citizenship.” Censorship and efforts to sanitize American history are now being lauded by the same voices that railed against “cancel culture.” That same logic has taken a deadly turn abroad. At Trump’s direction, the U.S. carried out a series of preemptive military strikes this year—against Iran’s nuclear sites, against the Houthis in Yemen, and most recently against what the administration claimed was a drug-trafficking boat off the coast of Venezuela. The White House has justified these deadly attacks—carried out without congressional approval or constitutional authorization—as part of the president’s unilateral war-making authority. This, too, is part of the bipartisan police-state architecture built after 9/11, when presidents claimed open-ended authority to wage preemptive war without meaningful congressional oversight. What began with Afghanistan and Iraq has metastasized into a global battlefield where any president can launch attacks—on Iran, on Yemen, on Venezuela—without accountability. As always, the justification is order, safety, and patriotism. The cost is truth, justice and freedom. Every time Trump expands his powers, the chorus is the same: It wouldn’t be necessary if Democrats had done their job. If you don’t break the law, you have nothing to fear. If you’re not doing anything wrong, why worry? These are the oldest excuses for tyranny—and they never change. Only the partisanship does. What makes Trump and those who came before him especially dangerous is not merely their willingness to wield power but the eagerness of their enablers to excuse and defend it at every turn. History shows that bullies and strongmen can only rise when mobs rally to their side. A tyrant’s greatest weapon is not his fist, but the crowd that cheers him on, intimidates his critics, and convinces itself that might makes right. The machinery of authoritarianism always needs a chorus of defenders, and today that chorus is louder, more organized, and more dismissive of constitutional limits than ever before. We have been building to this moment for a long time. Even so, why do people accept tyranny so easily? First, the cult of personality. When people invest blind faith in a leader, they will excuse anything he does. If he says surveillance is necessary, they believe it. If he says dissenters are enemies, they cheer their punishment. It is the psychology of the mob, cloaked in the loyalty of the true believer. Second, fear as a political weapon. Every despot knows that frightened people will tolerate almost anything. Fear of terrorism. Fear of crime. Fear of disease. Fear of immigrants. Fear of collapse. Fear makes people beg for the chains that bind them. Third, the “our side” fallacy. People imagine tyranny is only tyranny when the other side does it. When their side does it, they call it leadership. They call it patriotism. They call it protection. But the abuse doesn’t change when the party label does. Wrong is wrong. Every new regime that seizes power promises it will use extraordinary authority only for good. And every regime—without exception—uses it to entrench itself at the expense of liberty. Every generation tells itself the same lies to excuse the same abuses. Consider the whiplash of partisan double standards: Conservatives who blasted the Obama administration for NSA spying now cheer Trump’s Palantir partnership and AI-driven surveillance that tracks Americans’ digital footprints. Democrats who embraced Biden’s use of emergency orders to advance their agenda have been quick to denounce Trump for ruling by executive order. Those who bristled at COVID mandates under Democrats now applaud Trump’s use of government force to impose his own version of “public safety.” Both sides flip-flop on free speech. Conservatives denounced censorship on college campuses but defend banning “dangerous” books and surveilling dissidents, while liberals oppose Trump’s attempt to whitewash history yet defend platforms censoring speech they deem “harmful” or “hateful.” The double standard is breathtaking. Tyranny doesn’t change depending on who carries it out. Yet partisans convince themselves it does. They say: It’s different this time. It’s necessary. It’s for us. In truth, the only difference is who holds the whip. The Constitution was designed to restrain exactly this impulse. It does not say: “These rights apply only when the other party is in power.” It does not say: “The executive may rule by decree if he is popular.” James Madison warned that “if men were angels, no government would be necessary.” But men are not angels. That is why the Constitution separates powers, guarantees due process, and protects speech and assembly—especially in times of crisis. Every time one party tramples these limits, the other eventually inherits those same powers and uses them in turn. The Patriot Act, passed under Bush, was wielded aggressively under Obama, Trump, and Biden. The executive orders one president signs become the precedents for the next. “What you excuse today,” history warns us, “will be used against you tomorrow.” The descent into tyranny always begins with justifications. The Roman Republic collapsed into empire because senators claimed Caesar needed extraordinary powers to restore order. The republic never recovered. In 1930s Germany, emergency decrees were defended as temporary measures to stabilize society. They became the permanent architecture of dictatorship. In post-9/11 America, warrantless surveillance and secret courts were sold as temporary protections. Nearly a quarter-century later, they remain fixtures of government power. Tyranny is never announced as tyranny. It is always justified as safety, morality, and order. It is always explained away as temporary. And it is always defended by people who believe they are on the winning side. And so here we are. A president issues executive orders that erode the Bill of Rights. His supporters applaud. Another president expands surveillance or censorship. His supporters applaud. Both sides denounce the abuses of their opponents yet sanction the same abuses when carried out by their own. This is how liberty dies—not with a sudden coup, but with partisan politics valued more than principled freedom. The police state thrives on this selective outrage. It does not matter which party is in power. The machinery of control grows. The Constitution withers. And the people are left squabbling over whose tyrant is better. There is only one antidote: principle. You cannot defend freedom by defending tyranny when your side is in power. You cannot preserve liberty by cheering for its destruction. You cannot expect constitutional limits to shield you tomorrow if you discard them today. The warnings span centuries. The Founders foresaw the danger: James Madison cautioned against the “gradual and silent encroachments” of government. Thomas Jefferson warned that the natural tendency of power is to grow. Justice Louis Brandeis later confirmed it from the vantage point of the modern state: “the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachments by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” Those warnings went unheeded after 9/11, and we have been paying the price ever since. The bipartisan police-state architecture built in those years has only grown stronger, repurposed by each new administration. Unless we find the courage to dismantle it, today’s justifications will become tomorrow’s permanent chains. The lesson is clear: if you want liberty, you must defend it consistently—even when it restrains your own party, your own leader, your own side. Especially then. What you excuse today will be used against you tomorrow. As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, it does not matter whether the abuse comes draped in red or blue. It does not matter whether it is cheered by the Right or justified by the Left. Tyranny, once excused, becomes entrenched. WC: 1873 ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His most recent books are the best-selling Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the award-winning A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, and a debut dystopian fiction novel, The Erik Blair Diaries. Whitehead can be contacted at [email protected]. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/08/27/ingraham-how-is-allowing-600k-students-from-china-putting-america-first-those-are-600k-spots-that-american-kids-wont-get/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/08/27/ingraham-how-is-allowing-600k-students-from-china-putting-america-first-those-are-600k-spots-that-american-kids-wont-get/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Ingraham: “How is allowing 600K students from China putting America First? Those are 600K spots that American kids won’t get.”
    Ingraham: How is allowing 600K students from China putting America First? Those are 600K spots that American kids won't get. Commerce Sec. Lutnick: If you didn't have those 600K students, the bottom 15% of colleges would go out of business. pic.twitter.com/isSqsV0iLb — TheBlaze (@theblaze) August 26, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
More Results