• https://davidicke.com/2025/09/09/were-about-to-enter-false-flag-season/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/09/were-about-to-enter-false-flag-season/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    We’re about to enter ‘false flag’ season
    The UK Government’s Data (Use and Access) Bill, which received royal assent in June, has come into law and will be implemented forthwith. You probably haven’t even heard of it, because that is what happens when the government and their lapdog mainstream media want something to pass without public scrutiny. They simply don’t talk about it until it’s already well on the way to becoming law, or in some cases, already has. Big Brother Watch in the UK were one of very few voices pointing out the obvious implications of such a bill coming into law. Nearly all the bills that the government gets over the line, are there with the sole intention of giving them more control, and giving you and I less control over our own lives, less freedoms, and less money in our pockets, Some bills are about laying the groundwork for something else. They are about taking away the checks and balances that would prevent the government, from doing something they already have planned for further down the line. For instance, the World Health Organisation changed the definition of a pandemic to remove the words with enormous numbers of deaths and illness, meaning the powers that be, could later push the Covid button without the need for the deaths and illness to create a ‘pandemic’. The definition of vaccine has also subtly changed to accommodate the introduction of mRNA technologies. The newly adopted Data (Use and Access) Bill works on the same principle. Big Brother Watch stated in October last year that: “Our data protection laws are amongst the few legal protections we have against these threats (AI and the like), yet this Bill waters them down by simultaneously eroding privacy protections and restricting peoples’ control over their own data.” In other words, the protections that would allow you to keep certain things about yourself, your medical data for example, private, would be eroded. Big brother watch went on: “Meanwhile, advancing with a digital ID framework with serious implications for privacy that lacks a legal right to opt-out poses a serious threat to individual autonomy and consent.” And there is the point of all of this. Read more: We’re about to enter ‘false flag’ season [ickonic-banner]
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/13/governor-of-utah-spencer-cox-for-the-last-33-hours-i-had-been-praying-that-this-person-who-murdered-charlie-kirk-was-from-another-country/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/13/governor-of-utah-spencer-cox-for-the-last-33-hours-i-had-been-praying-that-this-person-who-murdered-charlie-kirk-was-from-another-country/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox: ““For the last 33 hours, I had been praying that this person (who murdered Charlie Kirk) was from another country.”
    🚨BREAKING: Governor of Utah, Spencer Cox: “For the last 33 hours, I had been praying that this person (who murdered Charlie Kirk) was from another country. That he was not one of us because we are not like that. But it was one of us. pic.twitter.com/7WZxH36DhI — CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) September 12, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/charlotte-train-stabber-says-he-was-under-mind-control/



    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/charlotte-train-stabber-says-he-was-under-mind-control/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Charlotte Train Stabber Says He Was Under Mind Control
    'He believed someone gave him a man-made material that controlled when he ate, walked, talked, etc...' (Ken Silva, Headline USA) The man who stabbed 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska to death on a public train in Charlotte has reportedly told his family that a government planted a chip in his body, and that he was under mind control. “He was a high risk. He was not in his right mind. He was not safe for society. We know what he has been dealing with the last three years. And now an innocent woman is dead,” said alleged killer DeCarlos Brown Jr.’s sister, Tracey Brown—as reported first by the Daily Mail. Brown reportedly told the outlet that she was assaulted by her older brother three years ago in an attack that saw him bite her and break a door, and that he’s a paranoid schizophrenic who told her multiple times that the government had implanted a chip in him. NEW - The Black career criminal and murderer of Iryna Zarutska now claims the government implanted materials in his body that made him commit the heinous crime.pic.twitter.com/yp1m36psM3 — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) September 10, 2025 Brown made similar comments to police on Jan. 19, when he was arrested for misusing 911. “He believed someone gave him a ‘man-made’ material that controlled when he ate, walked, talked, etc. Brown wanted officers to investigate this ‘man-made’ material that was inside of his body,” an arrest warrant in that case says. “Officers advised Brown that the issue was a medical issue and that there was nothing further they could do.” Read More: Charlotte Train Stabber Says He Was Under Mind Control [reveal-banner]
    2 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/how-tyranny-becomes-entrenched-9-11-and-the-police-states-endless-power-grabs/



    https://davidicke.com/2025/09/11/how-tyranny-becomes-entrenched-9-11-and-the-police-states-endless-power-grabs/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    How Tyranny Becomes Entrenched: 9/11 and the Police State’s Endless Power Grabs
    “The greatest tyrannies are always perpetuated in the name of the noblest causes.”—Thomas Paine They said it was for safety. They said it was for order. They said it was for the good of the nation. They always say it’s for something good… until it isn’t. Nearly a quarter-century after 9/11, we are still living with the consequences of fear-driven government power grabs. What began as “temporary” measures for our security have hardened into a permanent architecture of control. The bipartisan police-state architecture that began with 9/11 has been passed from president to president and party to party, each recycling the same justifications—safety, security, patriotism—to expand its powers at the expense of the citizenry. So they locked down the country “for our safety.” They expanded surveillance “for our security.” They rounded up anyone who challenged the narrative “for the common good.” They erased names, ideas, and histories “to prevent offense.” They forced schools to teach only what was politically correct “for the children.” They censored speech “for our protection.” They targeted dissenters “to preserve peace.” They militarized the streets and called it “law and order.” These very abuses—once denounced when carried out by the Left—are now cheered, defended, and excused when carried out by the Right. People who once spoke passionately about truth, freedom, and faith have now fallen silent in the face of injustice, or worse, convinced themselves that nothing is wrong. The very voices that should be warning against tyranny are instead excusing it or looking away. This is the danger of double standards in politics: every tyranny is rationalized in the moment by its chorus of defenders. But history teaches that what goes around comes around. If you justify it now, you’ll have no defense when the tables turn. And yet, time and again, the lies we tell ourselves make it possible. The cult of personality. The blind loyalty to party. The belief that “our side” can’t be the villain. It never ceases to amaze how far people will go to excuse the actions of their favorite tyrant, even when those actions are the very things they once swore to oppose. The pattern of justifying tyranny is as old as power itself. Every abuse comes wrapped in the same excuse: we had to do it. After 9/11, Americans were told the Patriot Act and mass surveillance were “necessary to prevent terrorism.” The result was a sprawling security state that tracks every phone call, every online search, every purchase. The justification was security. The cost was freedom. Under Obama, drone warfare and the prosecution of whistleblowers were defended as “keeping America safe.” The president even claimed the power to assassinate U.S. citizens abroad without trial. The result was an unaccountable government acting as judge, jury and executioner. The justification was safety. The cost was due process. During the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns and mandates were imposed in the name of “public health,” laying the groundwork for a Nanny State empowered to micromanage every aspect of our lives—where we go, what we buy, who we see. The result was government claiming control over every aspect of daily life. The justification was saving lives. The cost was the right to govern our bodies. Under Trump, the script is familiar. National Guard deployments in American cities are justified as “restoring order.” Sweeping surveillance is framed as “protecting communities.” Crackdowns on dissent are defended as “stopping criminals.” Mental health round-ups of the homeless are justified as “helping the vulnerable.” Militarized patrols on city streets are justified as “cleaning up the streets.” Turning ICE into a roving army of lawless thugs is justified as “protecting citizenship.” Censorship and efforts to sanitize American history are now being lauded by the same voices that railed against “cancel culture.” That same logic has taken a deadly turn abroad. At Trump’s direction, the U.S. carried out a series of preemptive military strikes this year—against Iran’s nuclear sites, against the Houthis in Yemen, and most recently against what the administration claimed was a drug-trafficking boat off the coast of Venezuela. The White House has justified these deadly attacks—carried out without congressional approval or constitutional authorization—as part of the president’s unilateral war-making authority. This, too, is part of the bipartisan police-state architecture built after 9/11, when presidents claimed open-ended authority to wage preemptive war without meaningful congressional oversight. What began with Afghanistan and Iraq has metastasized into a global battlefield where any president can launch attacks—on Iran, on Yemen, on Venezuela—without accountability. As always, the justification is order, safety, and patriotism. The cost is truth, justice and freedom. Every time Trump expands his powers, the chorus is the same: It wouldn’t be necessary if Democrats had done their job. If you don’t break the law, you have nothing to fear. If you’re not doing anything wrong, why worry? These are the oldest excuses for tyranny—and they never change. Only the partisanship does. What makes Trump and those who came before him especially dangerous is not merely their willingness to wield power but the eagerness of their enablers to excuse and defend it at every turn. History shows that bullies and strongmen can only rise when mobs rally to their side. A tyrant’s greatest weapon is not his fist, but the crowd that cheers him on, intimidates his critics, and convinces itself that might makes right. The machinery of authoritarianism always needs a chorus of defenders, and today that chorus is louder, more organized, and more dismissive of constitutional limits than ever before. We have been building to this moment for a long time. Even so, why do people accept tyranny so easily? First, the cult of personality. When people invest blind faith in a leader, they will excuse anything he does. If he says surveillance is necessary, they believe it. If he says dissenters are enemies, they cheer their punishment. It is the psychology of the mob, cloaked in the loyalty of the true believer. Second, fear as a political weapon. Every despot knows that frightened people will tolerate almost anything. Fear of terrorism. Fear of crime. Fear of disease. Fear of immigrants. Fear of collapse. Fear makes people beg for the chains that bind them. Third, the “our side” fallacy. People imagine tyranny is only tyranny when the other side does it. When their side does it, they call it leadership. They call it patriotism. They call it protection. But the abuse doesn’t change when the party label does. Wrong is wrong. Every new regime that seizes power promises it will use extraordinary authority only for good. And every regime—without exception—uses it to entrench itself at the expense of liberty. Every generation tells itself the same lies to excuse the same abuses. Consider the whiplash of partisan double standards: Conservatives who blasted the Obama administration for NSA spying now cheer Trump’s Palantir partnership and AI-driven surveillance that tracks Americans’ digital footprints. Democrats who embraced Biden’s use of emergency orders to advance their agenda have been quick to denounce Trump for ruling by executive order. Those who bristled at COVID mandates under Democrats now applaud Trump’s use of government force to impose his own version of “public safety.” Both sides flip-flop on free speech. Conservatives denounced censorship on college campuses but defend banning “dangerous” books and surveilling dissidents, while liberals oppose Trump’s attempt to whitewash history yet defend platforms censoring speech they deem “harmful” or “hateful.” The double standard is breathtaking. Tyranny doesn’t change depending on who carries it out. Yet partisans convince themselves it does. They say: It’s different this time. It’s necessary. It’s for us. In truth, the only difference is who holds the whip. The Constitution was designed to restrain exactly this impulse. It does not say: “These rights apply only when the other party is in power.” It does not say: “The executive may rule by decree if he is popular.” James Madison warned that “if men were angels, no government would be necessary.” But men are not angels. That is why the Constitution separates powers, guarantees due process, and protects speech and assembly—especially in times of crisis. Every time one party tramples these limits, the other eventually inherits those same powers and uses them in turn. The Patriot Act, passed under Bush, was wielded aggressively under Obama, Trump, and Biden. The executive orders one president signs become the precedents for the next. “What you excuse today,” history warns us, “will be used against you tomorrow.” The descent into tyranny always begins with justifications. The Roman Republic collapsed into empire because senators claimed Caesar needed extraordinary powers to restore order. The republic never recovered. In 1930s Germany, emergency decrees were defended as temporary measures to stabilize society. They became the permanent architecture of dictatorship. In post-9/11 America, warrantless surveillance and secret courts were sold as temporary protections. Nearly a quarter-century later, they remain fixtures of government power. Tyranny is never announced as tyranny. It is always justified as safety, morality, and order. It is always explained away as temporary. And it is always defended by people who believe they are on the winning side. And so here we are. A president issues executive orders that erode the Bill of Rights. His supporters applaud. Another president expands surveillance or censorship. His supporters applaud. Both sides denounce the abuses of their opponents yet sanction the same abuses when carried out by their own. This is how liberty dies—not with a sudden coup, but with partisan politics valued more than principled freedom. The police state thrives on this selective outrage. It does not matter which party is in power. The machinery of control grows. The Constitution withers. And the people are left squabbling over whose tyrant is better. There is only one antidote: principle. You cannot defend freedom by defending tyranny when your side is in power. You cannot preserve liberty by cheering for its destruction. You cannot expect constitutional limits to shield you tomorrow if you discard them today. The warnings span centuries. The Founders foresaw the danger: James Madison cautioned against the “gradual and silent encroachments” of government. Thomas Jefferson warned that the natural tendency of power is to grow. Justice Louis Brandeis later confirmed it from the vantage point of the modern state: “the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachments by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” Those warnings went unheeded after 9/11, and we have been paying the price ever since. The bipartisan police-state architecture built in those years has only grown stronger, repurposed by each new administration. Unless we find the courage to dismantle it, today’s justifications will become tomorrow’s permanent chains. The lesson is clear: if you want liberty, you must defend it consistently—even when it restrains your own party, your own leader, your own side. Especially then. What you excuse today will be used against you tomorrow. As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, it does not matter whether the abuse comes draped in red or blue. It does not matter whether it is cheered by the Right or justified by the Left. Tyranny, once excused, becomes entrenched. WC: 1873 ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His most recent books are the best-selling Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the award-winning A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, and a debut dystopian fiction novel, The Erik Blair Diaries. Whitehead can be contacted at [email protected]. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/08/27/ingraham-how-is-allowing-600k-students-from-china-putting-america-first-those-are-600k-spots-that-american-kids-wont-get/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/08/27/ingraham-how-is-allowing-600k-students-from-china-putting-america-first-those-are-600k-spots-that-american-kids-wont-get/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Ingraham: “How is allowing 600K students from China putting America First? Those are 600K spots that American kids won’t get.”
    Ingraham: How is allowing 600K students from China putting America First? Those are 600K spots that American kids won't get. Commerce Sec. Lutnick: If you didn't have those 600K students, the bottom 15% of colleges would go out of business. pic.twitter.com/isSqsV0iLb — TheBlaze (@theblaze) August 26, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/08/28/60-largest-tech-companies-will-permit-americans-to-access-their-personal-health-data-monetized-without-permission-for-years-youre-going-to-be-able-to-see-by-next-year-all-of-your-health-recor/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/08/28/60-largest-tech-companies-will-permit-americans-to-access-their-personal-health-data-monetized-without-permission-for-years-youre-going-to-be-able-to-see-by-next-year-all-of-your-health-recor/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    ” 60 largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data, monetized without permission for years: “You’re going to be able to see by next year all of your health records on your cell phone.” RFK Jnr
    NOW - RFK Jr. says the 60 largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data, monetized without permission for years: You're going to be able to see by next year all of your health records on your cell phone. pic.twitter.com/Wa9eZhrbkg — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) August 26, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    Angry
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/08/29/ai-firm-says-its-technology-weaponised-by-hackers/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/08/29/ai-firm-says-its-technology-weaponised-by-hackers/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    AI firm says its technology weaponised by hackers
    US artificial intelligence (AI) company Anthropic says its technology has been weaponised by hackers to carry out sophisticated cyber attacks. Anthropic, which makes the chatbot Claude, says its tools were used by hackers to commit large-scale theft and extortion of personal data. The firm said its AI was used to help write code which carried out cyber-attacks, while in another case, North Korean scammers used Claude to fraudulently get remote jobs at top US companies. Anthropic says it was able to disrupt the threat actors and has reported the cases to the authorities along with improving its detection tools. Using AI to help write code has increased in popularity as the tech becomes more capable and accessible. Anthropic says it detected a case of so-called vibe hacking, where its AI was used to write code which could hack into at least 17 different organisations, including government bodies. It said the hackers used AI to what we believe is an unprecedented degree. They used Claude to make both tactical and strategic decisions, such as deciding which data to exfiltrate, and how to craft psychologically targeted extortion demands. It even suggested ransom amounts for the victims. Agentic AI - where the tech operates autonomously - has been touted as the next big step in the space. But these examples show some of the risks powerful tools pose to potential victims of cyber-crime. The use of AI means the time required to exploit cybersecurity vulnerabilities is shrinking rapidly, said Alina Timofeeva, an adviser on cyber-crime and AI. Detection and mitigation must shift towards being proactive and preventative, not reactive after harm is done, she said. 'North Korean operatives' But it is not just cyber-crime that the tech is being used for. Anthropic said North Korean operatives used its models to create fake profiles to apply for remote jobs at US Fortune 500 tech companies. The use of remote jobs to gain access to companies' systems has been known about for a while, but Anthropic says using AI in the fraud scheme is a fundamentally new phase for these employment scams. Read More: AI firm says its technology weaponised by hackers [reveal-banner]
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/08/24/gates-foundation-digital-ids-are-an-effective-tool-against-poverty/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/08/24/gates-foundation-digital-ids-are-an-effective-tool-against-poverty/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Gates Foundation: “Digital IDs are an effective tool against poverty”
    It looks like we can add another to the growing mountain of problems that digital IDs are going to solve for all of us. We already know that digital IDs will help counter populism, and illegal immigration, and crime, and benefit fraud, and terrorism, and pandemics. But they’ll help tackle poverty now as well. That’s according to a report published a few days ago by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Digital IDs are an effective tool against poverty. A global solution is making them available to millions. I do love “making them available” in that sentence. As if the world is full of people desperately crying out for digital ID that the powers that be have been unable to supply, when the truth is literally the exact opposite of that. The aim of the report is promoting something they call Modular Open Source Identity Platform (MOSIP), an “adaptable, modular architecture […] that any country could customize to meet its specific needs.” For the last few years, MOSIP has been trialed in nine different countries across Africa and Asia, with over 90 million people signing up, the report calls it a powerful example of how low- and middle-income countries can harness open-source technology to improve lives and accelerate development. The developers of MOSIP are so worried about poor people in the third world not having any proper identification that they – and their backers at the Gates Foundation and the Omidyar Network – are giving it away to any country that wants it for free. Isn’t that nice of them? But wait, there’s more good news! The developers of MOSIP believe very strongly that interoperability is… a fundamental principle of good Digital Public Infrastructure It’s a “fundemental principle”, you understand, NOT a method of control. To sum up, the free software being funded by Bill Gates to supply digital IDs to the third world will all be based on the same proprietary code and be potentially interoperable. …all to tackle poverty and “increase economic participation”. Or terrorism. Or to secure the border. Or to protect the environment. Or to combat money laundering. Or help the unemployed. Or to prevent pandemics. Or to protect us from Artificial Intelligence. It depends on where you live. Regional marketing, like Disney removes black actors from their Chinese posters. Read More - Gates Foundation: “Digital IDs are an effective tool against poverty”
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/08/22/sharia-law-is-fine-apparently/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/08/22/sharia-law-is-fine-apparently/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Sharia Law is fine, apparently
    Tucker Carlson is now promoting Shariah law. How do people even find this edgy and entertaining? It's not even about Israel anymore. The man has become a total simp for Islamism. You can't convince me Qatar has nothing to do with this. pic.twitter.com/vG1PQePbuG — Han Shawnity 🇺🇸 (@HanShawnity) August 21, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
  • https://davidicke.com/2025/08/22/yes-alex-jones-did-warn-about-this-and-i-before-him-but-now-hes-promoting-the-man-who-is-doing-it-while-i-am-still-calling-it-out-more-than-30-years-later/

    https://davidicke.com/2025/08/22/yes-alex-jones-did-warn-about-this-and-i-before-him-but-now-hes-promoting-the-man-who-is-doing-it-while-i-am-still-calling-it-out-more-than-30-years-later/
    DAVIDICKE.COM
    Yes, Alex Jones did warn about this, and I before him, but now he’s promoting the man who is DOING it while I am still calling it out more than 30 years later
    TIM DILLON: “You’ve already got the military in the streets… FEMA camps… Palantir monitoring us… If this doesn’t scare you you’re nuts. This is everything Alex Jones warned about. Every conspiracy theorist’s wet dream.” pic.twitter.com/KMzipbfsjP — The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) August 20, 2025 [reveal-banner]
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views
More Results